PEOPLE CAN BRAG ABOUT ANYTHING TO MAKE THEMSELVES APPEAR INFLUENTIAL TO THE ONES THEY WANT TO IMPRESS..ESPECIALLY SOMEONE LIKE STONE
HE WAS NOT UNDER OATH AND HE CAN BRAG FALSELY AS MUCH AS HE WANTS
BESIDES, IF YOU NOTICE, THE EMAILS, AS EVIDENCE, ONLY "SUGGEST" OR "IMPLY" BUT DO NOT PROVE THAT STONE CLAIMED TO HAVE SPOKEN TO ASSANGE AND TO HAVE BEEN TOLD BY ASSANGE WHAT STONE'S EMAILS TO OTHERS MERELY "SUGGEST" AND / OR "IMPLY"
IF STONE HAD SPOKEN TO ASSANGE AND WAS GIVEN DIRECT REVELATIONS STONE WOULD HAVE INCLUDED THESE CLAIMS IN HIS EMAILS TO SUPPORT HIS BRAGGINGS
SEE MY PRIOR POSTS ON THIS AS WELL AS THE LINK BELOW
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-roger-stone-wikileaks-email-20181102-story.html
In email to Trump’s campaign strategist, Roger Stone implied he knew of WikiLeaks’ plans
ALSO SEE
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/roger-stone-wikileaks-insider/38364589/
JUST MY OPINION
http://goo.gl/alerts/VC8nB
No comments:
Post a Comment