AFTER WATCHING THE ENTIRE RISK DOCUMENTARY AS WELL AS SEVERAL VERSIONS OF THE RISK TRAILERS , I CAN ACTUALLY STATE...

AFTER WATCHING THE ENTIRE RISK DOCUMENTARY AS WELL AS SEVERAL VERSIONS OF THE RISK TRAILERS , I CAN ACTUALLY STATE THAT I DO NOT TRUST LAURA POITRAS

YOU CAN WATCH THE ENTIRE RISK DOCUMENTARY, FOR FREE, ONLINE AT THE LINK BELOW. JUST TYPE THE TITLE OF THIS DOCUMENTARY ON THE INTERNAL SEARCH FUNCTION

https://solarmoviez.to/movie/risk-20695/watching.html

AFTER 6 OR SO YEARS OF FILMING ASSANGE ON A REPORTED VERY INTIMATE LEVEL, POITRAS CENTERED HER EDITING ON ASSANGE'S SEX RELATED LEGAL PROBLEMS AS WELL AS ON HIS SPORADIC INVOLVEMENT WITH THE ELECTIONS OF 2016.

POITRAS DID NOT PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF ASSANGE'S WORK HAVING AFFECTED OR AFFECTING THE GREATER GOOD. SIMILARLY, POITRAS NEVER EVEN PRESENTED ANY EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENTS ABOUT ASSANGE'S FALL AS A RESULT OF HIS PERSONAL / PHILOSOPHICAL FAILINGS AND/OR DANGEROUS CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND HIS CONTROL THAT AFFECTED SOME OF HIS MUCH CRITICIZED DECISIONS, BEHAVIOR AND ACTIONS. EVIDENCE AND FACTS ABOUT THESE TYPES OF CONTRADICTIONS WERE READILY AVAILABLE TO POITRAS BUT SHE FAILED TO ADD THEM IN THE RISK DOCUMENTARY.

PERHAPS THE JUICER CONTRADICTIONS, SUCH AS ASSANGE'S MUCH CRITICIZED 911 STATEMENTS AGAINST 911 TRUTHERS, HIS PROTECTIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE ANNUAL BUILDERBERG MEETINGS, HIS PRO ISRAEL STATEMENTS AND ASSANGE'S FAILURE TO DELIVER THE OCTOBER SURPRISE AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON AND PADESTA DURING THE 2016 ELECTIONS, JUST TO NAME A FEW, WOULD HAVE MADE THE RABBIT HOLE A BIT DEEPER AND WOULD HAVE CLASHED WITH THE FORCES THAT POITRAS MAY HAVE BEEN TRYING TO PLEASE BEHIND THE SCENES.

PRESENTING ASSANGE AS THE VICTIM OF THESE FORCES WHO PERMITTED COMPROMISES IN ORDER TO SAVE HIS SKIN AND TO PROTECT HIS FAMILY WOULD HAVE LED TO SAME ADVERSE CONCLUSIONS AGAINST THESE EVIL FORCES WITH THE END RESULT OF ASSANGE BEING CONSIDERED A MARTYR AND GAINING SUPPORT FROM THE PUBLIC AT LARGE. THIS TYPE OF CONTRADICTION, OF COURSE, IS SOMETHING THAT NEITHER THE FORCES NOR POITRAS WOULD ALLOW.

ONE OF POITRAS'S VOICEOVER NARRATION STATES:
“I thought I could ignore the contradictions. I thought they were not part of this story. I was so wrong. They are becoming the story.”

DESPITE THIS CONFESSION TYPE OF NARRATION POITRAS DID NOT DELIVER THE GOODS AND MERELY PRESENTED THE SEX RELATED LEGAL PROBLEMS AS THE ONLY CONTRADICTION THAT WAS AVAILABLE AND WORTH DRAWING ATTENTION ON.

A SIMILAR OPINION WAS NOTED IN AN ARTICLE AT THE LINK BELOW:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-is-an-egomaniacal-sexist-creep-in-risk
WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Is an Egomaniacal, Sexist Creep in ‘Risk’
The latest documentary from Oscar-winning filmmaker Laura Poitras (‘Citizenfour’) paints a troubling portrait of the embattled publisher as it follows him from 2010-2016.

THIS ARTICLE STATES, IN PART:

"Assange is first introduced espousing his belief that people who take principled stances don’t last long, and that to survive, such individuals must invariably balance their convictions with a need to achieve their desired goals. Later on, Poitras—in one of many instances of oh-so-concerned voiceover narration—confesses, “I thought I could ignore the contradictions. I thought they were not part of this story. I was so wrong. They are becoming the story.” The fundamental problem with Risk, however, is that it presents no complex contradictions, unless one shares the film’s bedrock assumption that Assange initially embarked on an inherently honorable course (and/or believed he had), and then fell victim to his own personal (and philosophical) failings".


I FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE STATING MY BELIEF THAT LAURA POITRAS INTENTIONALLY EDITED THE RISK TRAILERS AS WELL AS THE RISK DOCUMENTARY IN A MANNER THAT WOULD MAKE JULIAN ASSANGE LOOK BAD, NON HEROIC AND NOT WORTHY OF THE IMAGE THAT WAS CREATED AROUND HIM BY HIS SUPPORTERS. DESTROYING ASSANGE'S PUBLIC PROFILE AND CHARACTER APPEARED TO BE LAURA POITRAS'S CONSCIOUS INTENT AND PURPOSE.

JULIAN ASSANGE MAY NOT BE THE BEST PERSON AROUND AND HE MAY VERY WELL HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED AND CORRUPTED A BIT ALONG THE WAY, BUT THE SUSPECT AND DECEPTIVE MANNER BY WHICH THE RISK TRAILERS AND RISK DOCUMENTARY WERE EDITED INDICATED NOT ONLY THE NOTED EVIL INTENT AND PURPOSE CLAIMED OF BUT ALSO THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF GOVERNMENT FINGERS UP IN LAURA POITRAS' ASS.

ASSANGE SHOULD HAVE ENTERED INTO A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH POITRAS THAT WOULD HAVE INSURED HIM SUBSTANTIAL EDITORIAL CONTROL OVER THE RISK TRAILER AND THE RISK DOCUMENTARY

http://theconversation.com/risk-julian-assange-film-by-laura-poitras-blurs-the-line-between-film-and-filmmaker-81645

Risk: Julian Assange film by Laura Poitras blurs the line between film and filmmaker

ASSANGE SHOULD WAIT THIS STORM OUT AND RELY ON THE FACT THAT LOGICAL AND SMART PEOPLE CAN SEE THROUGH TO POITRAS' INTENT AND PURPOSE,...EVEN SUPPORTERS LIKE MYSELF WHO DO NOT SUPPORT ASSANGE AS FAITHFULLY AS ONCE DID.

IF ASSANGE WANTS TO REGAIN LOST SUPPORT, HE HAS TO REMEDY THE DAMAGE HE HAS DONE WITH THE ABOVE NOTED CONTRADICTIONS. ... NOT ONLY BY WAY OF PUBLIC DECLARATIONS BUT ALSO BY WAY OF RELEASING ALL RELATED INFORMATION THAT IS BELIEVED TO HAVE BEEN WITH HELD BY HIM

ELENI

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CRITIC

http://theconversation.com/risk-julian-assange-film-by-laura-poitras-blurs-the-line-between-film-and-filmmaker-81645